Original title: Consuming Values
Jacob Conway, Levi Boxell · July 2026
Do people change where they spend money when companies speak out on hot social topics? Researchers looked at payment card records to see how customers react to corporate social stances. They used people's past spending to estimate whether shoppers agreed or disagreed with a business's public views. They found that taking a public stance actually raises a company's sales on average. In the month after big stance events, customers who strongly agreed with the company increased their purchases by 19 percent. Shoppers who strongly disagreed cut spending by 12 percent. These spending shifts shrank over time, but they still lasted a year later. Because supportive customers spend more, speaking out on social issues can be profitable for businesses.
You have a favorite coffee shop. One day the owner puts a sticker on the door endorsing a political candidate you strongly oppose. You feel uncomfortable and begin going to a different shop. Your friend, who supports that candidate, starts visiting more often. Here, the coffee shop is a firm, the sticker is its social stance, and the change in how often you and your friend visit is the spending patterns the researchers studied.
Companies increasingly take public stands on controversial social issues. This study shows that such stances directly affect their revenue: customers who agree spend more, those who disagree spend less. For profit-maximizing firms, ignoring social issues may mean leaving money on the table.
The abstract doesn't explicitly list limitations, but it focuses on widely known stance events and uses data from one payment card company, so results may not generalize to all stances or consumers. The analysis shows correlation, not causation, between stances and consumer response.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Consuming Values — Jacob Conway, Levi Boxell
Abstract licence: CC0
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.