Original title: How Correct Is Your Answer? A Semantic Correctness Framework for Open QA Evaluation
Elitsa Yotkova, Violeta Kastreva, Petar Velkov, Hristo Boyanov +3 · September 2026
Checking if artificial intelligence gives the right response to an open question is hard. An answer can be written in many ways, or fail in different ways, like leaving out details, contradicting facts, or adding made-up information. Older testing tools often miss these differences. To solve this, researchers built a new system that sorts answers into eight ranked levels. This separates wordy but accurate answers from answers with made-up facts. The team also created two new datasets and a testing tool called Context-Aware Precision, or CAP. CAP works by turning answers into statements and using logic models to check them in both directions against a reference. In tests checking if scores follow the ranked levels properly, CAP beat standard tools.
Imagine a teacher grading essays where students can answer in their own words. Some essays are long but correct, while others mix in false facts. The teacher needs a rubric that not only says 'right or wrong' but separates verbose correct answers from those with errors. Here, the researchers create that rubric for AI answers, sorting them into eight categories to catch hallucinations.
When AI gives free-form answers, we can't tell if they're mostly right or contain dangerous lies. This framework helps developers and users measure answer quality precisely, making AI more reliable for real-world use.
The abstract does not specify the range of QA datasets tested or compare against all possible evaluation metrics, and it only shows improvement under a monotonicity protocol, which might not cover all real-world scenarios.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
How Correct Is Your Answer? A Semantic Correctness Framework for Open QA Evaluation — Elitsa Yotkova, Violeta Kastreva, Petar Velkov et al.
Abstract licence: CC0
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.