Original title: InSight: A Benchmark for Agentic Claim Verification in Interactive Visualizations
Maeve Hutchinson, Syed Mahbubul Huq, Mohammad Albinhassan, Radu Jianu +2 · September 2026
Computer models that read text and images usually look at still pictures. But real data charts are interactive. Information might hide behind a click, show up across linked displays, or appear only when a user explores. To fix this gap, researchers built a testing ground named InSight. They took statements from real human data stories and tied them to working, interactive websites. In this test, an artificial intelligence agent must explore the web environment to check whether each statement is true, false, or impossible to verify. The benchmark also tracks the exact clicks and moves the models make to see how they search for clues. The researchers tested leading models and found that checking facts across interactive charts is still difficult.
Imagine you're at a party trying to confirm a rumor by asking different people. The rumor might be split across several conversations, and you have to decide who to talk to and in what order. Here, the interactive visualization is like the party where information is distributed across linked views, and the AI agent must navigate like you to verify a claim.
For people who use data visualizations to make decisions, AI needs to handle dynamic, interactive environments to be reliable. This benchmark shows current models aren't yet capable of that.
The abstract doesn't state limitations, but it notes that InSight is a benchmark, so it evaluates models without improving them. Also, it's focused on web-based interactive visualizations, which may not cover all types of dynamic data.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
InSight: A Benchmark for Agentic Claim Verification in Interactive Visualizations — Maeve Hutchinson, Syed Mahbubul Huq, Mohammad Albinhassan et al.
Abstract licence: CC0
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.