Original title: Fine-Grained Anomaly Perception in Wild UGC-Enhanced Images: A Comprehensive Dataset and Difference-Fusion Framework
Yan Zhong, Gefei Chen, Qiufang Ma, Zhen Wang +3 · September 2026
Social media platforms often use tools to enhance user images. However, these tools can accidentally create weird visual flaws, especially on faces, text, and textures. Traditional image quality tests miss these small, specific mistakes because they only measure overall picture quality. To solve this, researchers introduced a new task to spot these enhancement flaws and built a real-world dataset called UEAPQuality Anomaly Perception for UGC image Enhancement: a new task focused on detecting specific flaws from enhancement processes.-4k. This collection includes detailed tags showing the type of error, where it appears, and how severe it is. The team then created an approach named DFAP-UGCUser-Generated Content: photos, videos, and other media created by users on social platforms.. It works by directly comparing the original picture with the enhanced version, scanning locations closely, checking specific regions, and ranking quality. They also designed an end-to-end training method to balance these different jobs at once. Tests showed this system beats standard approaches adapted for the task, successfully catching tricky enhancement mistakes.
You bake a cake and decide to frost it to make it look better. But while frosting, you accidentally smudge the writing on top and make the edges uneven. You don't notice until someone points it out because you were focused on the overall look. In this paper, the enhancement process is like frosting the cake, and the researchers created a way to spot those smudges and uneven spots by comparing the frosted cake to the original design.
When social media platforms enhance images automatically, they sometimes make faces look strange or text unreadable. This erodes viewer trust and degrades the visual experience. Detecting these flaws could help platforms fix them before they reach your screen.
The abstract does not discuss limitations; it focuses on introducing the task, dataset, and method, and validates performance against baselines on their dataset.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Fine-Grained Anomaly Perception in Wild UGC-Enhanced Images: A Comprehensive Dataset and Difference-Fusion Framework — Yan Zhong, Gefei Chen, Qiufang Ma et al.
Abstract licence: CC0
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.