Original title: When Users Don't Ask: Benchmarking Context-Driven Memory Retrieval in Conversational Agents
Wen-Yu Chang, Yun-Nung Chen · September 2026
Chatbots powered by large language models need memory to talk over long periods. Usually, researchers test these memory systemsComponents that store and retrieve past information for conversational agents. like a quiz, asking direct question-and-answer style questions. In real chats, people do not always ask direct questions. To fix this, researchers built a benchmark called LOCOMO-CONV. It tests chatbots using four conversation styles, including subtle hints and multi-part queries. They tested five memory systems for finding information and generating good replies. The team found that regular chats reveal big retrieval weaknesses that direct quizzes miss, especially on implicit and composed queries. Also, finding the right facts does not always mean the bot writes a good answer. Sometimes, memory quietly helps the bot understand context without directly stating the exact stored fact.
Imagine you and a friend discuss your schedule, and later they say 'I hope the meeting isn't too early' instead of asking 'What time is the meeting?' Remembering the exact time from the hint requires careful listening. In this paper, chatbots struggle to remember details when users hint, and researchers test ways to make them better at catching these clues.
Chatbots that miss hints frustrate users and break natural conversation. This work shows the problem in real chats and points toward fixes.
The study evaluates only five memory systems and uses a benchmark derived from specific data, so results may not cover all scenarios or system types.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
When Users Don't Ask: Benchmarking Context-Driven Memory Retrieval in Conversational Agents — Wen-Yu Chang, Yun-Nung Chen
Abstract licence: CC0
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.