Original title: FailBench: How Reliable are VLMs at Judging Robot Task Success?
Zaruhi Navasardyan, Tatul Danielyan, Hrant Davtyan · September 2026
Robots need to know when they mess up a task, but can smart computer vision models tell if a robot succeeded or failed? Researchers created FailBench, a test set of robot videos, to find out. The models look at the visual evidence of what happened to judge the result. Surprisingly, even the best model achieved only 0.77 mean balanced accuracyA performance metric that treats successes and failures equally, useful when one outcome is more common.. Models do well when an object clearly moves, but they drop to near-chance on tricky tasks involving close contact and assembly. When evidence is unclear, these systems systematically guess that the robot succeeded, even if given more reasoning effort. Finally, cropping the images to focus right on the action improved the top model by 2.4 percentage points.
Imagine you're watching a friend assemble a piece of furniture from instructions, but you can only see the final product, not the building process. If it looks sturdy, you might assume it's fine, but hidden mistakes could make it unstable later. In this paper, AI models are like you, often guessing success when failures are ambiguous, especially in tasks where mistakes aren't visually obvious.
Robots are used in homes and factories, but if their AI judges can't reliably detect when tasks go wrong, errors might be missed, affecting safety and trust. This study shows current models aren't dependable, pointing to a need for better failure detection.
The abstract does not establish how these models perform in real-time or long-term deployments. It focuses on a benchmark evaluation, and the improvements from input interventions are limited without additional training. The study also doesn't address other types of robotic tasks or environmental factors.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
FailBench: How Reliable are VLMs at Judging Robot Task Success? — Zaruhi Navasardyan, Tatul Danielyan, Hrant Davtyan
Abstract licence: CC0
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.