Original title: </think> Doesn't Stop Reasoning: Analysis of Spurious CoT Termination
Seunghee Koh, Sungjae Choi, Minchan Kwon, Sunghyun Baek +1 · September 2026
Advanced AI models often think through problems step by step. This thought process makes them smarter, but it can get very long and repetitive. To save time, researchers try to cut the thinking short without extra training. One common method forces the model to stop by inserting a special stop tag, called an end-of-think token. The researchers found that this trick does not truly stop the thinking. Instead, the AI often sneaks extra reasoning into its final answer space until it creates its own stop tag. The more thinking time cut, the longer this extra reasoning lasts. The issue happens because the AI does not pay enough attention to the forced stop tag. Guiding the model to focus on the tag helps shorten the answer and stops the fake exit.
After finishing a chore, you might say 'done' but then spot one more thing to fix before truly moving on. The problem is that declaring the end doesn't always mean you stop immediately; you might keep going for a bit. In this paper, inserting the end token is like saying 'done,' but the model continues generating reasoning-like content before switching to answering.
Developers using early-exit methods to speed up models might not get the efficiency they expect, because reasoning continues even after they try to stop it. This affects anyone relying on these methods to cut costs or time in AI systems, as the intended transition to answering isn't clean.
The work shows that inserting an EoT token doesn't guarantee a clean transition from reasoning to answering. It is based on testing four models and five benchmarks, so the findings may not generalize to all scenarios. The proposed solution reduces spurious termination but is not claimed to eliminate it entirely.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
</think> Doesn't Stop Reasoning: Analysis of Spurious CoT Termination — Seunghee Koh, Sungjae Choi, Minchan Kwon et al.
Abstract licence: CC0
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.