Original title: A comparative study on the accuracy & repeatability of mobile robotic platforms for the delivery of precision NDE measurement
SeyedMohammadAmin Nabi Pour, S. Gareth Pierce, Randika Vithanage, Ehsan Mohseni +2 · September 2026
Inspecting large aerospace structures without damaging them requires high precision. Wheeled or walking mobile robots offer a flexible alternative to fixed robot arms for this work, but nobody had tested their positioning accuracy under one shared standard. Researchers tested five commercial mobile robots using a laser trackerA device that uses lasers to measure positions very accurately, serving as a ground truth reference. to measure their real-world positions. The robots used different navigation tools, including LiDAR sensors that map rooms or cameras tracking motion. The team tested how accurately each robot parked and followed paths. The best robot parked with a median accuracy of 8.2 mm, while the worst parked within 63.5 mm. A robot relying only on wheel sensors could not be calibrated at all. Following a path led to errors between 6.9 mm and 112.1 mm. Aerospace inspections require tolerances of 0.2 to 1.0 mm, so no mobile base is accurate enough alone. Every platform needs extra sensors.
Imagine trying to park a car perfectly aligned in a tight garage spot using only the car's own sensors. The sensors might misjudge distances, causing the car to be too far left or right, making it hard to open doors. In this paper, mobile robots are like the car, and the garage spot is the precise location needed for inspection. The researchers measured how well each robot could position itself, finding that most need extra help to be accurate enough for the job.
Aerospace engineers inspecting large aircraft need precise measurements to ensure safety, but current mobile robots aren't accurate enough on their own. This study quantifies how much extra sensing each robot needs, helping teams make informed choices about deployment.
The study only measures accuracy under a specific protocol and does not test all possible configurations. It does not claim that mobile robots can meet aerospace NDE tolerances without supplementary sensing. Results are based on five commercial platforms and may not apply to others or different environments.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
A comparative study on the accuracy & repeatability of mobile robotic platforms for the delivery of precision NDE measurement — SeyedMohammadAmin Nabi Pour, S. Gareth Pierce, Randika Vithanage et al.
Abstract licence: CC0
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.