Original title: IRWOZ 2.0: A Large Language Model-driven Dialogue Dataset for Industrial Robot Conversations
Chen Li, Dimitrios Chrysostomou · September 2026
Teaching industrial robots to talk with human workers is difficult when training data has errors. An earlier dataset called IRWOZ helped robots hold conversations, but its initial version had lots of noisy dialogue states and messy speech, which harmed performance. To fix this, researchers created IRWOZ 2.0. They used large language modelsAI systems trained on vast amounts of text that can generate and understand human language., specifically Mistral and Claude-3.5, to generate better text. They also added human corrections and removed typos automatically to clean everything up. The updated dataset now covers four industrial areas: Assembly, Delivery, Position, and Relocation. In testing, tracking the state of the conversation worked much better. A model called GPT-2 saw its BLEU-4 language score jump from 0.1651 on the old data up to 0.5604 on IRWOZ 2.0.
Imagine assembling furniture with instructions that have jumbled steps and misspelled parts. You might end up with a wobbly chair because the directions confused you. In this paper, the dataset for robot conversations was like those messy instructions, so fixing it made robots understand commands better and perform tasks more reliably.
This helps factory workers collaborate more safely and efficiently with robots. When robots understand commands better, tasks get done with fewer mistakes.
The abstract doesn't say what the limitations are. It focuses on the improvements made to the dataset and its evaluation for dialogue state tracking.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
IRWOZ 2.0: A Large Language Model-driven Dialogue Dataset for Industrial Robot Conversations — Chen Li, Dimitrios Chrysostomou
Abstract licence: CC0
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.