Original title: Beyond the Prank: The Hidden Expertise of TSS Scambaiters
Saleh Alsyefi, Anish Chand, Matthew Edwards, Phani Vadrevu · September 2026
Technical Support Scams trick people by pretending to fix fake computer problems. Fighting these criminals is difficult, but a dedicated group of volunteer operatives works to disrupt them. These volunteers are known as scambaiters. They deliberately contact scammers and waste their time to keep real victims safe. To understand this practice, researchers interviewed people who actively bait these fraudsters. The researchers wanted to learn why these volunteers do it, how scammers operate, and what challenges the baiters encounter. The study revealed that these volunteers hold deep insights into criminals. They also possess valuable technical and operational expertise that traditional research often lacks. Finally, the researchers identified key areas where this volunteer community needs better support to protect people effectively.
You are trying to learn how to spot a phone scam. Official warnings are often too generic, missing the specific tricks scammers use. In this paper, researchers interview volunteers who engage with scammers directly. They find that these volunteers have the specific knowledge that official research often lacks.
Tech support scams cost people money and trust. This research shows that the volunteers who bait these scammers have deep knowledge of how they operate—knowledge that academic researchers often lack. By understanding and supporting this community, we can build better defenses against these scams.
The abstract doesn't say. It covers the motivations, methods, and challenges of scambaiters based on interviews with 17 individuals.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Beyond the Prank: The Hidden Expertise of TSS Scambaiters — Saleh Alsyefi, Anish Chand, Matthew Edwards et al.
Abstract licence: CC0
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.