Original title: Are Unreachable Nodes Truly Safe? Fully Eclipsing Monero's P2P Network!
Ruisheng Shi, Jiaqi Zeng, Lina Lan, Shihan Zhang +5 · September 2026
Blockchains rely on computers talking to each other across a network. In an eclipse attackAn attack where a malicious actor takes over all of a node's connections to the network, so the node only sees what the attacker wants it to see., a bad actor surrounds a target computer by controlling all of its connections, cutting it off from honest peers. People believed that unreachable nodes—computers hidden behind network setups called NATs that block incoming connections—were naturally safe from these attacks. Researchers proved this belief is wrong. They created two attacks on Monero's peer-to-peer network that require zero incoming access to the victim. First, the attacker poisons the peer address lists on open computers. Those open computers then pass the bad addresses along to the hidden targets. Next, the attack takes advantage of how Monero regularly updates outgoing links, kicking out good peers until only malicious ones remain. The researchers found that attackers can reliably trap these hidden computers in stable, long-lived eclipse states, and they suggested fixes to stop the problem.
Imagine you live in a gated community with a strict security guard who only lets residents out, not visitors in. You feel safe because no one can knock on your door. But a thief bribes the guard to give you a fake list of neighbors. You start visiting those fake neighbors, and soon you only talk to the thief's friends. In this paper, the unreachable node is like you behind the gate, and the attacker poisons the peerlist of reachable nodes to eventually control all your outbound connections.
Monero users who run nodes behind home routers or firewalls are considered safer from network isolation attacks. This paper shows those nodes are actually vulnerable, and an attacker can fully control their view of the network. That means an attacker could feed them false transaction data, potentially enabling double-spending or privacy leaks.
The abstract does not specify the attack's success rate or the resources required. It also does not evaluate the proposed countermeasures. The attacks are demonstrated via simulation and on controlled targets, so real-world effectiveness against diverse network conditions is not established.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Are Unreachable Nodes Truly Safe? Fully Eclipsing Monero's P2P Network! — Ruisheng Shi, Jiaqi Zeng, Lina Lan et al.
Abstract licence: CC0
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.