Original title: Local Strain-Dependent Anisotropy in Fibrous Networks
Yoni Koren, Shahar Goren, Oren Tchaicheeyan, Ayelet Lesman · September 2026
Cells live inside a mesh of fibers called the extracellular matrix. These fiber networks get stiffer when stretched because the fibers switch from bending to stretching. While scientists often test the whole material at once, cells actually feel tiny, local differences in their surroundings. In this study, researchers investigated how pulling on a fiber network changes stiffness in specific directions at the microscale. They stretched fibrin gels in one direction and measured local stiffness using laser-based optical tweezers. Pulling the gels made them stiffer in both directions, but the stiffness rose much more along the stretch direction, creating direction-dependent stiffness called anisotropyWhen the properties of a material (like stiffness) are different depending on the direction you measure, like wood that splits easier along the grain.. Using computer models of fiber networks, they discovered that thinner fibers and more connected networks boost this directional stiffness difference by up to an order of magnitude. These local forces can guide how cells move, and they act differently from the overall material.
Imagine holding a loosely woven mesh bag. If you pull it from one side, the threads tighten and the bag becomes stiff. But if you pull it from another side, the threads slide and it remains floppy. Here, researchers studied a microscopic fiber network that stiffens more in the direction it is stretched than perpendicular to it, and they found that thinner fibers make this directional difference up to ten times larger.
This matters because cells sense the stiffness of their surroundings to decide where to move. In tissues, the extracellular matrix is a fibrous network that stiffens when stretched, but until now it was unclear how that stiffening varies at the scale of a single cell. The findings show that local stiffness anisotropy can be tuned by fiber thickness and connectivity, which could explain how cells migrate along stiffness gradients and help design better scaffolds for tissue repair.
This work is limited to fibrin gels under uniaxial stretch; other extracellular matrix components or loading modes may behave differently. The finite element model assumes a discrete random fiber network with specific parameters, and may not capture all biological complexity. Measurements are local and discrete, not full-field. The amplification of anisotropy by slender fibers is shown only for sub-isostatic networks; more connected networks may not show the same effect.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Local Strain-Dependent Anisotropy in Fibrous Networks — Yoni Koren, Shahar Goren, Oren Tchaicheeyan et al.
Abstract licence: CC0
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.