Original title: Current Status and Unmet Needs of EUS Education in Japan: A Nationwide Survey Focusing on Screening EUS, EUS-Guided Sampling, and Interventional EUS
Susumu Hijioka, Ichiro Yasuda, Atsushi Irisawa, Akio Katanuma +9 · September 2026
Doctors use endoscopic ultrasound, or EUS, to look inside the body and treat digestive diseases. It works by attaching an ultrasound probe to a thin, flexible tube that goes down the digestive tract to create detailed internal images. However, doctors in Japan learn this technique mostly through local apprenticeships, and training varies widely from hospital to hospital. Researchers surveyed hospitals across Japan to find out how they teach these procedures. They found that hospitals lack a standard training path. Rules for when a trainee can begin vary sharply everywhere. Complex treatments are usually reserved for senior doctors with more than 10 years of experience. Hospitals reported big teaching problems: too few cases, worries about medical complications, and an absence of practice models. In fact, only three institutions permanently owned dedicated phantom practice models. The authors conclude that Japan needs standardized training programs and better simulation tools.
Imagine learning to bake by following a different recipe every time you visit a new kitchen. Some kitchens have all the tools, others have none, and each chef decides when you are ready to try the oven yourself. In this paper, learning endoscopic ultrasound in Japan is like that: every hospital has its own rules and training resources, with no common recipe or practice kitchen to ensure every trainee learns the same skills.
For doctors learning endoscopic ultrasound in Japan, the quality of training depends entirely on which hospital they train at. This inconsistency affects patient safety, especially for complex procedures like EUS-guided sampling and interventional EUS, where errors can be serious. A standardized curriculum and simulation tools could reduce risk and train more skilled practitioners.
The abstract does not provide evidence on which training methods actually improve outcomes or reduce adverse events. It also does not compare Japan's training model to other countries' curricula. The findings rely on self‑reported survey responses, which may not capture actual practice or underreport issues.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Current Status and Unmet Needs of EUS Education in Japan: A Nationwide Survey Focusing on Screening EUS, EUS-Guided Sampling, and Interventional EUS — Susumu Hijioka, Ichiro Yasuda, Atsushi Irisawa et al. — DEN open — doi:10.1002/deo2.70430
Abstract licence: CC BY
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper.