Original title: Discordance between clinician- and patient-reported outcomes during radiotherapy for brain metastases: the prospective NeuroPRO study
Cas Stefaan Dejonckheere, Yonah Lucas Layer, Anna-Laura Potthoff, Thomas Zeyen +19 · September 2026
When cancer spreads to the brain, patients often get radiotherapy. Doctors track side effects with their own notes, but patients also fill out surveys about how they actually feel. These two perspectives do not always match. Researchers ran a study to see how well doctor reports and patient reports agreed during brain radiation. They compared side effects reported by both sides at the start, at the end of treatment, and at follow-up. They found that doctors regularly underestimated how bad symptoms were. Across most shared symptoms, patients reported worse problems than doctors recorded. The biggest misses were for emotional and thinking issues, like worry and drowsiness. In contrast, doctors and patients agreed much better on obvious physical side effects like vomiting and seizures. Despite these missed symptoms, patients said their overall health stayed stable and they had low regret about their treatment choices.
Imagine you and a friend both describe how heavy your backpack feels. You're carrying it and feel every strap; your friend sees it from across the room and thinks it looks light. Neither is lying — you're working from different information. In this paper, the person carrying the backpack is the patient, and the doctor is the friend outside, consistently missing the weight of invisible problems like worry and tiredness.
When doctors miss symptoms, patients suffer in silence — fatigue, worry, and depression go untreated while physical side effects get attention. This study shows the gap is systematic, not occasional. Routinely asking patients directly could close it, improving quality of life for thousands undergoing brain radiotherapy.
The abstract doesn't state limitations; it reports a prospective cohort of 63 patients, so generalizability beyond this group is unknown.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Discordance between clinician- and patient-reported outcomes during radiotherapy for brain metastases: the prospective NeuroPRO study — Cas Stefaan Dejonckheere, Yonah Lucas Layer, Anna-Laura Potthoff et al. — Clinical and translational radiation oncology — doi:10.1016/j.ctro.2026.101283
Abstract licence: CC BY
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper.