Original title: Utilization of whole-body computed tomography in trauma: The role of trauma center level and ACS verification
Daniel Tabibian, Jeffrey Balian, Kevin Tabibian, Arjun Chaturvedi +5 · September 2026
When people hurt themselves in car crashes, doctors often use whole-body CT scans to search for hidden damage. A CT scan uses X-rays to take detailed pictures inside the body. A full-body scan checks the head, chest, and abdomen. But for stable patients who have normal blood pressure and full awareness, doctors do not always know if scanning everything helps. Researchers checked hospital records to see how often doctors scan stable crash victims. They also looked at whether hospital credentials changed these choices. They found that most stable patients did not get full-body scans. Instead, they got scans aimed at fewer body parts. Full-body scan use dropped over time across hospitals, regardless of trauma levels or how badly patients were hurt. However, hospitals verified by a major surgical group were nearly twice as likely to use full-body scans, while non-profit or government hospitals used them less often.
Imagine you sprain your ankle playing soccer. You go to the clinic, and the doctor decides whether to X-ray it. Normally, the decision depends on how swollen it is and whether you can walk. But suppose the decision also depends on whether the clinic is a sports medicine center or a general practice. In this paper, the choice between a whole-body CT and a selective CT depends more on whether the hospital is an ACS-verified trauma center than on the patient's actual injury severity.
The decision to scan a stable car crash victim from head to toe depends more on which hospital they enter than on how badly they are hurt. Patients at ACS-verified centers are nearly twice as likely to receive a whole-body CT, even after accounting for injury severity. This matters because whole-body CT delivers a large radiation dose, and unwarranted variation suggests some scans may be unnecessary.
The abstract doesn't explicitly list limitations, but it describes an observational study using TQIP data from stable MVC patients, so results may not generalize to other populations or mechanisms.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Utilization of whole-body computed tomography in trauma: The role of trauma center level and ACS verification — Daniel Tabibian, Jeffrey Balian, Kevin Tabibian et al. — Surgery open science — doi:10.1016/j.sopen.2026.08.003
Abstract licence: CC BY
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper.