Original title: Explaining symptoms in general practice: a predictive processing framework for primary care consultations
Kees van Boven, Peter Lucassen, Tim Olde Hartman, Omer Van den Bergh · September 2026
Doctors often struggle to explain why a patient's symptoms change or persist when physical disease seems minimal or stable. To help, researchers created a clinical tool based on an idea called predictive processingA theory that the brain constantly predicts what it is about to perceive, rather than passively receiving signals from the body.. This idea explains that what we feel is not just signals from the body. Instead, our brains actively combine incoming bodily signals with prior expectations. Because of this mix, real and disabling symptoms can happen even without major physical damage. The authors found that this framework gives general practitioners a clear way to talk with patients. It helps doctors validate a person's lived experience, explain why symptoms continue, and guide care toward steady recovery. They also provided a practical consultation example showing how doctors can apply these ideas.
Imagine cooking a familiar soup. You taste it halfway and add salt based on memory of how it usually turns out, not just what is in the pot. If that memory is strong, you can swear the soup is salty even before tasting it, and keep tasting salt when the recipe says there is none. In this paper, the body's signals are the soup and the brain's expectations are the memory of how the soup should taste, so a doctor can explain why symptoms feel real and persist even when tests show no damage.
For people whose symptoms persist despite normal test results, this changes the conversation with their doctor. Instead of being told nothing is wrong, they get an explanation: the brain's expectations shape what they feel. That makes symptoms no less real, but it opens a path toward recovery rather than endless investigation.
The abstract does not present trial evidence; it presents a conceptual framework. It offers limited prescriptive guidance — that is, it does not specify exactly what a doctor should say or do in each situation. The framework's clinical benefit is therefore not established by direct trial evidence.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Explaining symptoms in general practice: a predictive processing framework for primary care consultations — Kees van Boven, Peter Lucassen, Tim Olde Hartman et al. — Scandinavian journal of primary health care — doi:10.1080/02813432.2026.2731974
Abstract licence: CC BY
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper.