Original title: Mapping the Landscape of Community Care for Children, Young People and Families: A Co-Produced Project
Sorcha Ní Chobhthaigh, Camille Cox, Twyla Greenway-Bailey, Josephine Musanu +7 · September 2026
Many children and families cannot access official government mental health services, so they rely on grassroots community groups instead. Researchers do not know much about how these groups operate or what challenges they face. To find out, a team worked directly with young people and community members. They mapped independent community services across London and Greater Manchester that provide free wellbeing help to young people aged 0–18 and their families. They gathered details on what these groups do and what holds them back. They found that most groups use equity-oriented practices, which means tailoring care to treat people fairly and safely, especially through culturally specific support. However, very few take an intersectional approach that considers overlapping identities. Most help went to older children rather than early prevention. Finally, fragile funding and a rush to respond to urgent needs force these groups into tough trade-offs that threaten their stability.
Imagine trying to find a free after-school program for your child. You look online, call around, but the programs that appear one week vanish the next because their funding runs out. Each program also advertises that it welcomes all children, but only a few adjust for a child's specific needs, like language or disability. In this paper, researchers mapped hundreds of such programs for children's mental health and found that most are unstable and only a few truly account for multiple forms of disadvantage.
Children and families who cannot access government care depend on community mental health services. But this mapping shows that nearly half of such services are excluded from government commissioning, and even those that exist face funding instability that undermines care. Policy that relies on community partnerships must be backed by sustainable funding and support for truly inclusive practices.
The abstract doesn't say explicitly, but the mapping is limited to two English regions and to free, non-government-commissioned services for children's mental health. Equity practices were identified from advertisements, which may not reflect actual provision. The study does not evaluate service effectiveness or user experiences.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Mapping the Landscape of Community Care for Children, Young People and Families: A Co-Produced Project — Sorcha Ní Chobhthaigh, Camille Cox, Twyla Greenway-Bailey et al. — medRxiv — doi:10.64898/2026.09.10.26362741
Abstract licence: CC BY
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.