Original title: Economic assessment of burden of animal diseases in donkeys in Ethiopia
The study estimates how much disease costs households that rely on working donkeys in Ethiopia. It compares a model of donkeys’ current health with an ideal scenario where they are free of disease. The gap between the two estimates includes lost income, spending, and other losses. The researchers estimate that the gap equals 28% of the income households could potentially earn from their donkeys.
Imagine running a small market stall and comparing what you earn now with what you might earn if nothing disrupted your work. Some days you lose sales, and some money goes toward fixing problems. In this paper, the stall’s lost earnings and costs stand for the losses linked to donkey disease, while the disruption-free version stands for the ideal health scenario.
Working donkeys support household and farm economies in Ethiopia, yet their health costs have been poorly measured. These estimates help show how much income is lost and can inform decisions about donkey health and welfare.
The abstract does not report how accurate the model is against observed losses, or whether the proposed policies and interventions would reduce the burden. The national estimate is an extrapolation from a model parameterised with survey, interview, expert, and literature data, and is presented with a prediction interval.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Economic assessment of burden of animal diseases in donkeys in Ethiopia — Girma Birhan Asteraye, Gemma L. Chaters, Ruth Jobling et al. — Preventive Veterinary Medicine — doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2026.107043
Abstract licence: CC BY
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper.