Original title: Why Politicians Retweet: News Trustworthiness, Emotion, and Partisan Asymmetry in Elite News Sharing among US Congress Members
Apeksha Shetty, Esther Simmendinger, Jula Lühring, Annie Waldherr +2 · September 2026
When politicians retweet news, they shape what millions of people see and believe. Researchers wanted to know what drives those choices. They studied United States Members of Congress on social media to see why they share certain news stories. They checked whether legislators care more about reliable facts or party loyalty. They found that partisan identity mattered more than anything else. Politicians usually preferred to share links to trustworthy news sites. But that preference faded when tweets mentioned political parties. Negative emotions also drove shares: anger and fear made politicians more likely to retweet posts about their rivals. Anger did the opposite for posts about their allies. Finally, party ideology changed how politicians treated facts. Among Republicans, more extreme members cared less about news trustworthiness. The most extreme Republicans were especially likely to share links from untrustworthy sites. Overall, politicians use retweets to attack opponents and protect allies.
You are deciding which book to recommend to a friend. Normally you check whether the book is accurate. But if the book's topic aligns with your friend's favorite hobby, you overlook errors. In this paper, politicians treat news like books: they retweet news that supports their party, even when the source is not trustworthy, especially when the news attacks the other side.
This matters for anyone tracking misinformation. Politicians with large audiences retweet untrustworthy news more when it attacks opponents or fits their party. It shows political elites help false claims spread, which distorts public debate and deepens polarization.
The study only covers US Congress members from 2021 to 2023 and focuses solely on news-related retweets. Findings may not generalize to other politicians, time periods, or types of sharing. The analysis is correlational, so causality cannot be established, and the NLP measures of emotion and partisan cues have inherent limitations.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Why Politicians Retweet: News Trustworthiness, Emotion, and Partisan Asymmetry in Elite News Sharing among US Congress Members — Apeksha Shetty, Esther Simmendinger, Jula Lühring et al. — SocArXiv — doi:10.31235/osf.io/2hvpf_v1
Abstract licence: CC BY
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.