Original title: A questionnaire survey on context-dependent requirements for the trustworthiness of artificial intelligence and humans
Satoshi Nishida · September 2026
Trusting artificial intelligence is complex because what people need from a system changes based on the situation. Yet, we know little about how everyday people view these needs. Researchers surveyed nonexpert participants to find what makes AI trustworthy in social versus nonsocial situations, comparing their answers to human trust. They discovered that protecting private data is always vital for AI, no matter the context. Beyond privacy, context matters. In nonsocial settings, people trust AI if its decisions are clear and easy to interpret. In social settings, they care more about collaboration, good communication, a positive public image, and an attractive look. Human trust showed similar shifts, with one key difference: people always demand collaboration and communication skills to trust humans across every context, whereas for AI, those social skills only matter in social settings.
Imagine deciding whether to trust a new neighbor. You might trust them to water your plants while you're away, but you wouldn't trust them to babysit your child without knowing them better. The things that matter for trust depend on what you're asking them to do. In this paper, the requirements for trusting an AI change depending on whether it's used in a social or nonsocial context, just like your trust in a neighbor depends on the task.
As AI moves into homes, hospitals, and public spaces, people's trust depends on what the AI is doing. This study shows that in task-oriented settings, people care most about transparency and explainability, but in social settings, they want the AI to be collaborative and have a good appearance. Designers can now tailor AI to match context-specific trust expectations, which could improve adoption and acceptance.
The abstract doesn't explicitly state limitations, but as a questionnaire survey, it relies on self-reported preferences and only examines social vs nonsocial contexts. The sample of nonexpert participants may not represent all demographics, and actual trust behavior may differ from stated preferences.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
A questionnaire survey on context-dependent requirements for the trustworthiness of artificial intelligence and humans — Satoshi Nishida — PsyArXiv — doi:10.31234/osf.io/6wv7f_v1
Abstract licence: CC BY
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.