Original title: Double Adaptation: Negotiating Closeness and Managing Boundaries in Journalist–Politician Relations
Marina Urbanikova, Lenka Waschkova Cisarova, Iveta Jansová, Melanie Haberl +2 · September 2026
Journalists need to stay close to politicians to get news. Yet getting too close can damage their independence and honesty. Researchers studied how reporters handle this tricky balance. They interviewed political journalists in Austria and Czechia to see how they set limits with political sources. They found that journalists rely on a process called double adaptation. This means reporters adjust their behavior on two separate levels. First, they adapt to specific, day-to-day moments. They balance nine different types of closeness across their interactions and personal relationships. Second, they adapt to larger, outside forces. Things like money pressures, online changes, and political spin doctors force them to change how they work. In short, reporters actively reshape their professional boundaries to fit both immediate conversations and huge industry changes.
Imagine you are a student who wants to be friends with a teacher to get extra help, but you also need to keep enough distance to be objective when grading. If you get too close, the teacher might favor you, but if you are too distant, you miss out on valuable guidance. Here, journalists face the same dilemma with politicians: closeness gives access to information, but risks losing independence. The study shows that journalists constantly adjust their behavior—sometimes based on the specific situation (like a friendly chat vs. a formal interview) and sometimes based on larger pressures (like their newsroom's budget cuts or the rise of social media).
For anyone who reads political news, this matters because the way journalists manage relationships with politicians shapes what gets reported and how. When journalists get too close, they may lose critical distance; when too distant, they lose access. This study shows the balancing act is more complex than it seems, involving both personal choices and pressures from the media industry.
The study is based on interviews with journalists in Austria and Czechia, so findings may not generalize to other media systems or to politicians' perspectives. It proposes a framework but does not test it quantitatively or measure outcomes like actual loss of independence. The focus is on journalists' perceptions, not on observed behavior.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Double Adaptation: Negotiating Closeness and Managing Boundaries in Journalist–Politician Relations — Marina Urbanikova, Lenka Waschkova Cisarova, Iveta Jansová et al. — SocArXiv — doi:10.31235/osf.io/79weg_v1
Abstract licence: CC BY
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.