Original title: The Electoral Effects of U.S. Prison Construction
Nicholas Ottone, Amanda Weiss · September 2026
Between 1980 and 2000, the United States opened over 400 prisons. Few people had studied how building these prisons affected the political choices of nearby residents. To find out, researchers created a model linking prison openings to local economic, attitudinal, and voting outcomes. They then tracked county-level data across forty years of prison construction. They found that building a prison decreases the county-level vote share for Republican candidates. This backlash is especially strong if Republicans represented the county when the facility was built. Why does this happen? The researchers argue that local voters face negative economic side effects from the prisons. As a result, voters punish Republicans—the party tied to these policies—and turn against funding future prison bond measures.
Imagine your town decides to build a new landfill. At first, it seems like a good idea—it creates jobs and solves a waste problem. But soon, you notice the smell, traffic, and lower property values. You start to blame the local officials who pushed for it, and you vote against them next election. In this paper, the prison is like the landfill: it brings negative side effects that voters punish the party that built it, especially if that party was in charge.
For decades, politicians assumed building prisons was a popular law-and-order move. This study shows the opposite: communities near new prisons punish the party that built them, especially Republicans. That changes how we think about the politics of mass incarceration and why some communities resist prison expansion.
The abstract does not specify limitations, but the study focuses on county-level electoral effects and does not examine individual-level voting behavior or effects beyond the 1980-2000 period. It also does not explore potential heterogeneity by prison type or region, or the impact on non-electoral political participation.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
The Electoral Effects of U.S. Prison Construction — Nicholas Ottone, Amanda Weiss — SocArXiv — doi:10.31235/osf.io/dnwke_v1
Abstract licence: CC BY
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.