Original title: Representations of Change Support Object Individuation in Infancy
Peter Mazalik, Justin Halberda · September 2026
How do babies figure out how many things are hidden in front of them? Normally, we know two items exist if we see them at the same time. If a screen hides them, babies must use clues like what the items look like. Before 12 months, babies struggle to tell how many objects are hidden just by seeing different types, like a duck and a truck. They also fail when items only differ by color. Researchers tested if babies understand the abstract idea of change itself. They showed infants a screen where two objects came out one after the other. One object changed continuously, while the other stayed static. Babies successfully used this difference to figure out that two separate objects were present. This was not just because the changing object caught their eye. By 8 months, infants already understand change as a core property of the world.
Imagine you are at a party and two people keep walking behind a curtain. One person is constantly changing their hat, the other wears the same hat. You cannot see their faces, so you need to know if there are two people or just one who keeps changing hats. In this paper, infants face a similar puzzle: they see objects that change or stay the same, and they use that difference to decide how many objects there are.
This matters because it reveals that even before they can talk, babies already grasp change as a core property of the world. It challenges the idea that infants only track objects by static features like color or shape. Instead, they can use dynamic information—whether something changes or stays the same—to figure out how many things are in front of them.
The abstract does not specify which types of change infants encode, over what timescales, or in which cognitive systems. It also does not compare change to other features like color or shape directly in this experiment. The results are limited to the contrast between a continuously changing object and a static one.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Representations of Change Support Object Individuation in Infancy — Peter Mazalik, Justin Halberda — PsyArXiv — doi:10.31234/osf.io/wy9a8_v1
Abstract licence: CC BY
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.