Original title: A randomised controlled trial of Detour: a multi-component app-based intervention for youth smoking cessation
Suhaavi Kochhar, Hanneke Scholten, Maartje Luijten · September 2026
Smoking kills millions of people, and adolescents and young adults report the highest smoking rates. Quitting before age 30 can prevent most of these health risks, but there are few interventions built specifically for youth. Researchers created a smartphone app called Detour to guide young people through a five-week quitting process. Detour uses multiple components over one preparation week and four post-quit weeks. The team tested the app against a digital self-help brochure to see which tool helped more people stay smoke-free. The app did not work as hoped. Participants using Detour did not have higher rates of quitting than people reading the digital brochure at any point. Surprisingly, the app group actually reported higher levels of weekly smoking than the brochure group across all check-ins. The researchers suspect that technical problems in the app and the strength of the comparison brochure might explain these results.
You decide to get better at cooking by following a recipe app that sends you constant tips and reminders. Instead of improving, you start making more mistakes and feel so stressed that you fall back on fast food. In this paper, the app meant to help young smokers quit actually led them to smoke more, possibly because using it kept cigarettes on their mind and the technical glitches added frustration.
Adolescents and young adults smoke at the highest rates, yet few programs work for them. This trial tested a smartphone app designed to help them quit, expecting it to beat a simple brochure. Instead, app users reported smoking more weekly than the brochure group at every check-in, suggesting that well-meaning digital tools can backfire and need careful testing before rollout.
The abstract does not explain the unexpected result. It notes the comparison was against an active control (a brochure), so both groups received some help, and it suggests technical problems with the app might have hampered engagement. It does not include an inactive control group, so general intervention effects cannot be separated from the app's specific effect. Measurements relied on self-report, and the study did not confirm smoking via biochemical tests.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
A randomised controlled trial of Detour: a multi-component app-based intervention for youth smoking cessation — Suhaavi Kochhar, Hanneke Scholten, Maartje Luijten — PsyArXiv — doi:10.31234/osf.io/yhdm4_v1
Abstract licence: CC BY
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.