Original title: Individual Differences in Curiosity Propensity and Contrasting Teaching Approaches in Early Childhood Education
John Kaneko, Eric Pakulak, Sofia Frankenberg · September 2026
Kids are naturally curious, but some want to explore more than others. Researchers do not yet know how these personal differences shape how children learn under different teaching styles. To test this, the authors built a model. It explains that a child's natural urge to explore clashes or fits with how much freedom or uncertainty a classroom provides. The researchers checked this idea using data from preschool classrooms that used either direct teaching or open inquiry methods. They measured learning outcomes like executive functionMental skills that help you plan, focus attention, remember instructions, and juggle multiple tasks, like self-control and working memory., which is the mental ability to plan and focus. They found that kids with high curiosity had worse executive function gains when placed in direct instruction classrooms, but not in inquiry classrooms. Curiosity also helped predict executive function results overall and showed a trend toward predicting early math skills.
Imagine you are trying to learn a new board game. One way is to read the rulebook cover to cover before playing. Another way is to start playing and figure out the rules as you go. Some people get bored and distracted reading the rulebook first, but they learn quickly by experimenting. Others get frustrated and confused when they have to discover rules on the fly, but they learn well from clear instructions. In this paper, curiosity propensity is like that personal preference—it affects which learning style helps a child succeed.
This matters because early childhood classrooms often pick one teaching style for everyone. If a child's curiosity level makes them thrive with hands-on discovery but struggle with direct instruction, or vice versa, then a one-size-fits-all approach could hold some kids back. Teachers and parents might need to match how they teach to how curious a child naturally is.
The abstract notes this is a preliminary test with data from a single preschool intervention study. Results for math outcomes were only at a trend level, not statistically robust. The study relied on parent-rated curiosity, which may differ from observed behavior. Sample size and measurement methods are discussed as needing improvement in future work.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Individual Differences in Curiosity Propensity and Contrasting Teaching Approaches in Early Childhood Education — John Kaneko, Eric Pakulak, Sofia Frankenberg — EdArXiv — doi:10.35542/osf.io/yr372_v1
Abstract licence: CC BY
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.