Original title: Memory experiences under psychedelics – an exploratory prospective online study
Samuli Kangaslampi, Kim PC Kuypers · September 2026
Scientists know little about how psychedelics make people remember personal life events, even though this could help or harm therapy. To investigate, researchers tracked people taking classic psychedelics in everyday life. They gave participants online surveys before their trip, 1-3 days later, and 3-5 weeks later. They wanted to see how much people remember, what they recall, and whether these memories connect to breakthroughs or mood changes. They found that participants spent around a quarter of their experience recalling past events, though individual times varied widely. Positive and recent memories showed up most often. Many participants dug into difficult territory. Four in ten recalled usually avoided memories, nearly half recalled potentially traumatic events, and a quarter recalled things they had never remembered before. Digging up avoided memories linked to more psychological insights, emotional breakthroughs, and feelings that the trip was useful, though memories did not predict changes in well-being.
Imagine cleaning out your attic after years. You find boxes of old photos and keepsakes. Some bring back happy memories, but others remind you of painful events you'd rather forget. You might even come across items you don't remember ever owning. In this paper, the psychedelic experience acts like that attic cleaning, but it happens in your mind, bringing up memories you usually avoid or have never accessed before.
For anyone using psychedelics, whether in therapy or on their own, this study shows that memory recall is a central part of the experience. That matters because it suggests psychedelics could help process trauma, but also that people might recall things that never happened. Therapists and users need to be aware of these effects to maximize benefits and minimize risks.
The abstract doesn't explicitly list limitations, but it notes the study is exploratory with a small sample (N=66) and relies on self-report, so results should be interpreted cautiously. Causality cannot be established, and the naturalistic setting may not generalize to clinical contexts. The finding of never-before-recalled memories raises concerns about false memories, but the study did not verify them.
Ask anything about this paper. Answers come from its abstract, and say so when the abstract doesn't cover your question.
Memory experiences under psychedelics – an exploratory prospective online study — Samuli Kangaslampi, Kim PC Kuypers — PsyArXiv — doi:10.31234/osf.io/zwybe_v1
Abstract licence: CC BY
Explanation generated by Synthesis from the abstract — it is not the original paper. This is a preprint, so it hasn't necessarily been peer reviewed.